# What is the Apache Software Foundation? annotation is allowed on a tag. The asfgenid plugin reenables script, style, and iframe html tags. Review Markdown content within an HTML blockĭisallowed html the tagfilter extension disables certain html tags. I managed to get it done with a span element instead, but not without setting the display to 'inline-block': text tjebo at 18:17 3 Doesn't work for me.Exception to this rule for style, pre, and script. It annoyingly did not work when creating the markdown document (GitHub flavour) with rmarkdown.Make sure the first line of any html block starts in column one.If your project previously built its site using the Apache CMS, here are some differences from that the CMS used: Sites built with the ASF-Pelican template use a version of cmark-gfm by GitHub through the pelican-gfm plugin that Infra created.ĭetailed Specification with many examples. If you have an mdtext file, it is from the Apache CMS, which is deprecated as of summer, 2021. Simply the best set of flashcards for GitHub Flavored Markdown. So simply include a blank line after the opening raw HTML tag and you won't have any issues. As the spec explains, Markdown is processed within a raw HTML block after the first blank line. I don't like the name of either, what's wrong with release_notes.md?).Content for this site, and for all sites using the ASF-Pelican template, is structured using GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM).įile extensions are md, markdown, mkd, and mdown. An as you are using Github Flavored Markdown, you get the added benefit that when formatted properly, you can still have Markdown processed within the block level raw HTML tags (so long as the parser you are using is compliant with the spec). You may find the list of file names which github treats specially at (including that it might have a different name), that would work better. Getting started with writing and formatting on GitHub. If meta/libraries.json could override where to find release_notes.md You can structure the information shared on GitHub with various formatting options. GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM), Pandoc, and Markdown Extra among others. I and undoubtedly others already keep their release notes in a markdownįile to please github, but it doesn't live in meta/ nor is it going to. Markdown is a lightweight markup language for creating formatted text using a plain-text. I've also developed a Makefile to convert all. It converts from/to a number of formats, including Markdown, Rest, HTML and others. > automatically compiles these (as it currently does for meta/libraries.json). I've not found a quick and easy method for GitHub-flavoured Markdown, but I have found a slightly more generic version - Pandoc. > every author updates meta/release_notes.md in his repo, and the website > The pull request workflow isn't very elegant. > Does anyone object or have comments about this? > extensions (for example, to link against an issue in a boostorg repo). > The syntax will be GitHub flavored markdown, with a few Boost-specific > instead of Quickbook format, as a pull request against a file > * Each author will edit the release notes for their library using markdown > We need to re-render all of this historical release notes, such as: Reply: Andrey Semashev: "Re: Release Notes: Markdown to replace QBK".Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: Release Notes: Markdown to replace QBK".In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: Release Notes: Markdown to replace QBK".Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: Release Notes: Markdown to replace QBK".It differs from standard Markdown (SM) in a few. Next message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: Release Notes: Markdown to replace QBK" GitHub uses what they are calling GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) for messages, issues, and comments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |